User talk:LuK3: Difference between revisions

From Deep web, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(rm)
m (Protected "User talk:LuK3": Persistent vandalism ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 19:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 19:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC))))
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:17, 14 February 2020

This user doesn't care whether you use {{talkback}}, {{ping}}, or {{reply to}} when you reply to him on other pages. He just want to be notified somehow.

Your recent edit to User talk:DESiegel

In this edit you removed content from my user talk page. I have reverted your edit. Please do not make such edits in future, as per the notice on my talk page in the "Procedure" section. I will remove any content I choose to, and will revert on sight any removals by anyone else, unless they involve properly oversighted content. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

My apologies DESiegel, noted for the future. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your incredible work fighting vandalism and POV-pushing edits tonight. Thank you! OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you OhKayeSierra for the barnstar! And congratulations on your new baby girl! -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Talk Page semi-protected

Information icon.svg

Per your request, due to vandalism, your user talk page has been semi-protected for a few days. -- Alexf(talk) 18:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

File:GrapeFruit.jpg listed for discussion

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GrapeFruit.jpg, has been listed at Deep web:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Deep web New page reviewer.svg

Hello LuK3,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)