Deep web:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Deep web, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Creating deletion discussion page for Arjun Panesar. (TW))
 
m (+link)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:{{la|Arjun Panesar}} – (<includeonly>[[Deep web:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Deep web:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 12#{{anchorencode:Arjun Panesar}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Deep web:Articles_for_deletion/Arjun_Panesar_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
 
:{{la|Arjun Panesar}} – (<includeonly>[[Deep web:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Deep web:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 12#{{anchorencode:Arjun Panesar}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Deep web:Articles_for_deletion/Arjun_Panesar_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
 
:({{Find sources AFD|Arjun Panesar}})
 
:({{Find sources AFD|Arjun Panesar}})
'''Procedural nomination'''. This was deleted at [[Deep web:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar]] in 2017. It was recently recreated as a draft, then moved to mainspace. It was tagged for speedy deletion under [[WP:CSD#G4]] as a recreation of content deleted at a discussion. The discussion was a bit thin -- only two editors, each commenting quite briefly. The only reason given was lack of demonstrated notability. The recreated version has more sources, including several more recent than the deletion discussion. I declined the speedy as not sufficiently identical with the previous version, but current notability seems less than clear cut to me, so I am bringing it here for a consensus decision on the current notability of this subject. I am not expressing any opinion at the moment on whether this should be kept, deleted, returned to draft, or redirected to the business which Panesar founded and runs. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
+
'''Procedural nomination'''. This was deleted at [[Deep web:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar]] in 2017. It was recently recreated as a draft, then moved to mainspace. It was tagged for speedy deletion under [[WP:CSD#G4]] as a recreation of content deleted at a discussion. The discussion was a bit thin -- only two editors, each commenting quite briefly. The only reason given was lack of demonstrated notability. The recreated version has more sources, including several more recent than the deletion discussion. I declined the speedy as not sufficiently identical with the previous version, but current notability seems less than clear cut to me, so I am bringing it here for a consensus decision on the current notability of this subject. I am not expressing any opinion at the moment on whether this should be kept, deleted, returned to draft, or redirected to the business which Panesar founded and runs ([[Diabetes.co.uk]]). [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Deep web:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)</small>
 
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Deep web:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)</small>
 
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Deep web:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)</small>
 
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Deep web:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 00:03, 13 October 2019

Arjun Panesar

Arjun Panesar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Procedural nomination. This was deleted at Deep web:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar in 2017. It was recently recreated as a draft, then moved to mainspace. It was tagged for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G4 as a recreation of content deleted at a discussion. The discussion was a bit thin -- only two editors, each commenting quite briefly. The only reason given was lack of demonstrated notability. The recreated version has more sources, including several more recent than the deletion discussion. I declined the speedy as not sufficiently identical with the previous version, but current notability seems less than clear cut to me, so I am bringing it here for a consensus decision on the current notability of this subject. I am not expressing any opinion at the moment on whether this should be kept, deleted, returned to draft, or redirected to the business which Panesar founded and runs (Diabetes.co.uk). DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)