This template is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Deep web. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Deep web. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I tend to agree with your edit and point. I think it kinda started out as pretty monumntal type sites when created by another editor, but as it expanded, and more sites were added for their importance not so much for their monumentality, guess you get the picture. Good change. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2015
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Wupatki National Monument should be added to the sites list
22.214.171.124 (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
When Cristopher Columbus arrived in the Americas, Inca and Aztec cultures still there were and when Inca and Aztec cultures there were the United States and Canada there weren’t. - 126.96.36.199 (talk) 21:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC).
Most of the terms we use for pre-Columbian regions and cultures are anachronistic. If we eliminated "North America" in the article, what would we call the region. The article is divided into a list of regions, "Southeastern", "Northeastern", etc. whose names are just as anachronistic as "North America". What would you suggest we use as a replacement for those terms? It is generally only when we get to the level of tribes, chiefdoms, or towns, that we have an inkling of what the people called themselves, often depending on how much we trust European transcriptions of names. - Donald Albury 00:03, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Edited 00:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)