This user has administrator privileges on the English Deep web.
Bot operator top icon
This user has signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic personal data.
This user is a member of the Wikimedia volunteer response team.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
This user uses Huggle to fight vandalism.
This user uses HotCat to work with categories.
This user edits using the gadget wikEd.
Identified as a precious editor on 12 February 2017
Email this user
This user has email notifications enabled.
This user uses the name JJMC89 on IRC.
JJMC89's page on GitHub

User talk:JJMC89

From Deep web, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:JJMC89 bot)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This user has opted out of talkbacks

This user prefers to be notified by Notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user. No talkback messages are needed.

File:Sunday Herald front cover 4 May 2014 by Alasdair Gray.jpg[edit]

If you are proposing any other fair use files for deletion, please consider in the future having the courtesy to inform the uploader. Thanks. --The Huhsz (talk) 17:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

FastilyBot has delivered the notification. — JJMC89 05:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

And please also see the discussion at Talk:Alasdair Gray about your tagging of this image. I invite you to review your action. Thank you. --The Huhsz (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

I see you've already contented the deletion on the file's talk page, which is the correct venue. Nothing has changed in the article that makes me think that it shouldn't be deleted. — JJMC89 00:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
That's hard for me to understand. Would you mind taking the time to explain that to me? Also, please reply to my request of 17:00, 10 January 2020 about the protocol of marking files for deletion. --The Huhsz (talk) 01:19, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
At the time of tagging the article said, Gray designed a special front page for the Sunday Herald in May 2014 when the newspaper came out in favour of a "Yes" vote in that year's unsuccessful independence referendum.. At the time of my previous response, only The cover consisted of a large thistle framed by Scottish saltires; Iain Macwhirter described it as "striking". was added. There is nothing there that requires seeing it to understand. Now, Gray's design, and his and the paper's support for independence, attracted widespread press coverage at the time and later. gives me hope if what was said about the design would be incorporated into the article. — JJMC89 05:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
I have removed the F7 tag, as I believe the image now has a solid NFCC #8 rationale. Jheald (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Michigan Army National Guard Soldiers protect Detroit Firefighters during the 1967 Detroit Riots..jpg[edit]

Updated license and removed the warning. {{PD-Pre1978}} — for works first published in the United States prior to 1978 without explicit notice of "copyright, year, owner" or "©" attached. Reverted picture due to the above rationale. I have been on Deep web for two weeks and I am discovering different Deep web pages with different licenses all the time. Getting the correct one for someone new is sometimes daunting. I hope this resolves the issue. Boston1775 (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Used same logic as above to make changes to File:Economy Printing Raid.jpg Boston1775 (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that. If they were uploaded under that license to begin with, we could have avoided the issues with the non-free licensing. — JJMC89 05:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Croix de guerre 1914-1918 with silver star from World War I.jpg[edit]

Thank you for helping to maintain copyright standards on Deep web. I have addressed your concerns on the talk page and also on the talk page of File talk:Croix de guerre 1914-1918 with silver star and bronze palm from World War I.jpg Boston1775 (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

I look forward to your response regarding the reasons I gave regarding "contextually significant". I tried to be direct but neutral in the language I used in my response. Not sure if you as an administrator reviews the matter or if another administrator who didn't post the concern must address it. Also I posed a question to Deep web:Media copyright questions in regards to the French copyright question. Not sure, if that needs to be resolved first or how this works. As stated in an earlier post I've been on here for two weeks and seek to follow the rules. However, the reasons for deletion of those pictures I believe are not warranted. Thank you. Feel free to respond to me here or on my talk page if you are following it. Boston1775 (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

The licensing issues and contextual significance issue have been explained to you at WP:MCQ and the file's talk page. — JJMC89 05:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Bad G5s[edit]

G5 speedy deletion is supposed to be used only for articles to which no substantive edits had been made by other users. You have recently made many G5 deletions of Mishae/Biografer creations that fail that test. Please reverse them. The ones I checked prior to your deletions as having such edits (and in most cases to which I made substantive edits myself, in some cases deliberately to pre-empt any possible G5 deletion) include Emily Agree, Tanja Schultz, Kathryn Albers, Sandra Irving, Sonia Aissa, Amy Schmitz, Barbara Aldave, and Joan Redwing. They should not have been deleted and you should undelete them. I think you should also double-check all the other deletions you have made to make sure you have not made many more similar mistakes. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

PS see related discussion at WP:AN#AfD might possibly be closed?David Eppstein (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
And now also WP:ANI#Excessive use of db-g5 by ThatMontrealIP. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
I've undeleted Sonia Aissa; I don't know how I managed to miss your removal. For the rest, I don't consider your edits substantial, especially your one word removal in Barbara Aldave. — JJMC89 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the Aissa undeletion; I've removed more Mishae badness from it. The case for substantiality is arguable for some of those articles, but I still think it is clear for Tanja Schultz (new source, significantly more detailed description of award, and removal of a different award) and Kathryn Albers (removal of inaccurate description in lead and addition of a new sentence about what her research is actually about). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning it up. On Schultz and Albers, maybe you're right. If you're going to rewrite any of the ones in your OP like you did for Aissa, you could create a new article or you can go ahead and undelete them yourself. Otherwise, I'll ping another admin for a third opinion and undelete if they agree with you. — JJMC89 05:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Ok, I've undeleted and cleaned up Tanja Schultz. I think I'll just leave Kathryn Albers deleted for now; I don't understand her research area well enough to be confident of doing the necessary full rewrite accurately (except that I'm pretty confident Mishae got it wrong). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

I am trying to understand the deletion of Gilda_Barabino. I apologize that I’m not well-versed in the rules and norms of Deep web editing, but I’m happy to do work or provide information to help restore the page for a notable academic and college Dean. Terronk (talk) 15:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Bio. deletions[edit]

In dealing with those sockpuppet deletions, you're leaving the talk p. behind. Is that deliberate?

I'm verifying and marking a few. Normally, I would want to review every one, but this is simply too much. (And Im not sure the ones which might be based on a foreign language WP article qualify for him being sole author) DGG ( talk ) 07:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

It was an oversight during a portion the my deletions. I will take care of any that are remaining. — JJMC89 03:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

notice of notice[edit]

HI JJMC89, I mentioned you in Deep web:Administrators' noticeboard#Partial Blocks PSA. — xaosflux Talk 19:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your work at SPI[edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your work at Deep web:Sockpuppet investigations/জঙ্গলবাসী and related cases.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar, Bbb23 — JJMC89 05:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)


Hi, kindly block Wamerson2019 as it is a rather obvious sock of Fwamerson1302. Thank you. Minorax (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

 Blocked and tagged — JJMC89 05:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Flag icons in section headings[edit]

Hi JJMC89. Is there a way to tweak User talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/November#Images in headings to search for flag icons (or more generally template brackets) in section headings? -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

You can try insource:/== *\{\{flag/ (change flag as needed) for ones at the beginning of headings. insource:/== *\{\{[^\}]+[^=]+/ may work more generally for any template at the beginning of a heading. I couldn't figure out one for any position in a heading that didn't have too many false positives. — JJMC89 06:55, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for that. I'll give it a try. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleting the page about Hartmut Esser[edit]

I just saw that you deleted the page about Hartmut Esser. If I understand it correctly, it had something to do with the user who created/edited it. However, I think that the page about this Prof. Esser is still useful to have (e.g. for his work "Habermas and the media"). Wouldn't it be better to continue on that page then, i.e. undo the deletion? I could spend some time to improve it in the next days. The alternative for me would be to start over without knowing what was on the page; but why should this been preferred? --Zuphilip (talk) 14:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suspected Deep web sockpuppets of Tonyb1961[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Suspected Deep web sockpuppets of Tonyb1961 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Deep web. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Deep web's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Mail Notice[edit]

Hello, JJMC89. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Celestina007 (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)